[ioquake3] Possible Q3VM bug -- need Q3VM expert

[Ludwig Nussel]

Patrick Baggett wrote:
> It is harmless, but isn't a "correct" implementation. It just happens that
> other parts of the code do the same += 4 hack too so nothing goes wrong.
> Changing the += 4 to ++ gives bad VM instruction. I've successfully modified
> it to not have these holes and everything works correctly. The vm_x86.c
> doesn't call this function, so I imagine that it would be unaffected. I
> don't know if anyone is interested.

You are right. The interpreter indeed uses vm->instructionPointers
too. So those holes are not needed.

cu
Ludwig

-- 
 (o_   Ludwig Nussel
 //\   SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Development
 V_/_  http://www.suse.de/